Talk:Muslim Brotherhood

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Muslim Brotherhood article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3: 90 days

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.

Crime and Criminal Biography: Organized crime Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Organized crime task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Egypt High‑importance

	Egypt portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Islam High‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion: New religious movements Mid‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by New religious movements work group (assessed as Top-importance).

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Syria High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SyriaWikipedia:WikiProject SyriaTemplate:WikiProject SyriaSyria articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Terrorism Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on terrorism, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TerrorismWikipedia:WikiProject TerrorismTemplate:WikiProject TerrorismTerrorism articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

This article was the subject of an educational assignment supported by WikiProject United States Public Policy and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Bob Rinearson (January 13, 2005). "We need not welcome an apologist for terror". Fort Wayne News Sentinel (IN).

Democratic faction

While MB has many members with radical views, it has also been described in some Cases as holding "Islamic Democratic" views. Some members even self-indentify as "Islamic Democrats" or following "Islamic Democracy". 2A02:8108:1640:5282:7D38:C805:60A9:8DAA (talk) 19:28, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Misspelling of the word violence

"The group's founder accepted the utility of political violance" Violence is not spelled that way. Sdp29 (talk) 12:56, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Iskandar323 (talk) 13:16, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 19 October 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Literetarure: Hussein Solomon, and Arno Tausch. „The Demise of the Muslim Brotherhood in the Arab World?.“ Jewish Political Studies Review 31.1/2 (2020): 171–209. https://jcpa.org/article/the-demise-of-the-muslim-brotherhood-in-the-arab-world/ Austrian political observer (talk) 18:41, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Brendan ❯❯❯ Talk 04:46, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template

Maybe there should be Navbox listing all the organizations Braganza (talk) 12:15, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Members

as cohesive as the "presence outside of Egypt" section is, I think a list would be a better way to convey member organizations; sorted by country etc Castroonthemoon (talk) 17:30, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Questionable source about who funds the "brotherhood"

Currently there's this line in the text: "In recent times, the primary state backers of the Muslim Brotherhood have been Qatar and the AKP-ruled Turkey." And the only source provided (currently numbered "47"), is this one: https://nationalinterest.org/feature/pakistans-support-the-haqqani-network-undermining-us-21300

I see two issues with this source:

First, in the article this is claimed: "The two states are the region’s staunchest supporters of the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas, and have been rather willing to flirt with Tehran." but no source, no numbers, no official report is provided.
Second, based on the first critics, now it's important to look at the authors of this only source. The authors are: Aykan Erdemir and Merve Tahiroglu. And there's an issue also with this.

Bear with me, because it's the combination of the TWO elements above that are, in my opinion, problematic: they provide NO source for their claim AND they are widely biased authors.

So why do I dare to call them "biased authors":

First author: On the same website as the source mentioned above: https://nationalinterest.org/profile/merve-tahiroglu, Merve Tahiroglu is described as "Merve Tahiroglu is a research associate focusing on Turkey for the Foundation for Defense of Democracies." And, the wikipedia article about this (Foundation for Defense of Democracies) describes this foundation as: "The Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) is a non-profit neoconservative think tank and (since 2019) a registered lobbying organization based in Washington, D.C., United States. It has also been described as a pro-Israel, anti-Iran lobby group due to its focus on Iran and opposition to the 2015 nuclear deal with Iran.". So it's safe to say that an author who provides no source and who's part of a "neoconservative" American based foundation is probably not the most neutral and unbiased source.
Second author: https://nationalinterest.org/profile/aykan-erdemir, is described as "Aykan Erdemir is a former member of the Turkish parliament and the Director of Global Research and Diplomatic Affairs at the Anti-Defamation League." This Anti-Defamation League is described as "ADL is also known for its pro-Israel advocacy. It has advanced the concept of new antisemitism, including a definition that says anti-Zionism and some criticisms of Israel are antisemitic. It has received criticism, including from members of its staff, that such advocacy has diverted ADL from its historical fight against antisemitism." on Wikipedia. Again, that's far from being a neutral and unbiased or even a journalistic organization.

Conclusion

So we have one source to "prove" that Qatar and Turkey are funding the brotherhood. That source provides no numbers, report or database to read from, it's just a claim in an article written by two authors who are massively biased and part of think tanks and foundations which are clearly not journalistic.

I am not saying that the initial claim is wrong (I have no doubt that Qatar and Turkey fund the brotherhood), but the source that is provided is not sufficient, worse it does not even provide one number or any kind of financial information. Mrjay42 (talk) 10:21, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]